It’s the concept of 14.7 in Sūrya Siddhānta, 5.21.3 in Bhāgavata Purāṇa, 3.2-5 of Bṛhat Parāśara, etc. I hate when people intentionally make snide hidden denigrations, especially when those denigrations are false.Ī) There is not “One Vedic Astrology teacher.” There are at least four very active practitioners and teachers I can immediately think of off the top of my head – and there are hundreds of people experimenting with and accepting the theory.ī) It’s not a “novel concept” that some “Vedic Astrology teacher” invented. One Vedic Astrology teacher has espoused the novel concept that, as he considers the nakshatras sidereal and the rashis tropical, both of these are to be used simultaneously in the chart in the different zodiacs. The authentic tropical zodiac consists of 12 (determined primarily by the Sun). The authentic sidereal way consists of 27 divisions (determined primarily by the Moon). I almost agree but there are not “two zodiacs.” There are two ways of dividing space. In Jyotish, we use the sidereal zodiac for birth charts and the tropical zodiac for matters pertaining to the weather.īoth zodiacs are entirely valid and the precession of the Vernal equinox, which defines the difference, has a key role in the destiny of mankind. I will quote relevant portions and reply directly. Andrew Foss wrote an article appearing in the March 2017 edition of Gocara, the Journal of BAVA (British Association of Vedic Astrology) in which he attempts to debunk the use of a tropical zodiac in Vedic astrology.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |